Perez Hilton vs. Miss California

Relevant link: http://www.feministing.com/archives/015000.html

Yep, you knew it was coming...I just had to make a comment about this shit. See, I personally don't give one fuck about Miss California's comments. She's in a beauty pageant, not the US Senate. Some fucktard asks a purposefully political question because that's the sort of crap he's known for: causing problems. Yes, Perez Hilton is simply a douchebag who enjoys saying shit to get a rise out of people. I understand why he gets off to it as I like doing the same thing, but Hilton's agenda is much more sinister than the old Digital Barbarian's. Plus, he sucks because he's entirely politically motivated based on money. He makes money by being inappropriate and not having any manners. That's the definition of an asshole. No matter how much I rant on here, I don't go to people in public and make a mockery of them out of pure greed. Anyway, enough of the digression. So Miss California says she doesn't support gay marriage. Sounds fine to me. She was asked a stupid question, gave an honest answer, and now is catching hell for it. See, I thought these girls were SUPPOSED to be honest and not adhere to some stupid politically correct agenda, but apparently they're actually supposed to be idiotic puppets who will win at any cost. I'm sure the girl knew that saying an "unpopular" answer (in quotes because the vast majority of the people in this country subscribe to the same view, including the voters in her home state) might result in her not winning, but so what? At least she had enough integrity not to spout off some bullshit in order to win a contest. Anyone saying shit about her needs to shut the fuck up. Give the girl props for being in front of millions of people and saying what she knew might cause a little bit of strife.

Okay, now before I tackled the link above, let me cover a few facts:

1) Marriage is, by definition, only possible between a man and a woman. Before you email me with some stupid bullshit, remember that marriage is essentially a contract between two people who are joining two families and will eventually pass on property, titles, names, etc. to their progeny. Gay dudes and dykes can't have kids together, which means marriage isn't relevant to them. Historically, religiously, traditionally, whatever, that's what marriage is. The erosion of morality in our society has opened the door for things like in vitro, sperm banks, adoption by gay couples and whatever. Just because those things exist in no way invalidates the definition of marriage. Being able to clone someone doesn't magically make eugenics morally permissible.

2) Miss California MUST disapprove of gay marriage by virtue of her faith. Anyone with the same belief system as her who advocates gay marriage is simply a hypocrite. Admonishing her because she follows traditional and religious views is about as bigoted as you can get. If her answer was anything else, she would have been lying and also not adhering to her religion. To be quite honest, she seems to be a respectable individual given the situation and how she acted.

Alright...now to the idiot feminists. All quotes pulled from the above link.

"Her answer was homophobic because she advocated denying gay people the right to get married."

Gay people can get married, they just have to marry someone of the opposite sex like everyone else. Heterosexual people cannot marry people of the same sex, either. Are their "rights" being denied? I have a lot of issues with the inherent illogic of this statement, but I think what pisses me off the most is the idea that a "right" is being denied. Who the fuck decided that marriage was a right? I don't understand that one. Marriage, again by definition, has nothing to do with love, romance, picking out china or going to fucking Walmart together. It's about creating a situation that allows a viable family to be produced. People who cannot produce viable families should be denied marriage. There's no "right" being violated. The fucking feminist morons in the US have decided that anything they want to do is their "right", regardless of consequence. Except, of course, if they don't like it. They support gay "marriage" as a right, but dudes who want to fuck 12 year old girls, well, they're just rapists, even if the girls want to fuck the dudes. Hey, aren't their rights being violated? Shut the fuck up about rights, fattyists. You don't have a clue what you're fucking talking about. Also, I like how this girl is somehow homophobic because she doesn't want marriage to be degraded and diluted to a meaningless phrase. Yeah, well, apparently you're not allowed to have a differing opinion from one of the fattyists because that makes you a homophobic racist bigot. Fattyists: look up bigot in the dictionary. That's you. Also, "open minded". That means doing what they like, it surely doesn't mean having an opinion but not bothering people about what they do if you don't approve. Do any of these idiots have the capacity for rational thought?

"I think the whole idea of beauty pageants is ridiculous"

Why? Oh yeah, I forgot...fattyist. Every single fucking fattyist on Earth hates hates hates beauty pageants because they "objectify women". That's what they say, but I know the real reason: they are fat, ugly and annoying. You have to be attractive with a nice personality to win a beauty pageant; no fattyist is any of these things. So, of course, pageants are a waste of time, money, etc. They should be outlawed, right? Fattyists would like nothing more than a ban on pageants, but wouldn't that make them hypocrites for stomping all over someone else's "right" to compete? No, see, fattyist logic dictates that whatever THEY want to do is good and whatever THEY hate is bad. It's a pretty good philosophy, one that famous, powerful dudes like Hitler and Stalin promoted.

In conclusion, fattyists have been logically proven to be fascist fucks with disgusting bodies, faces and minds.